InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook / FAA Instrument Procedures Handbook: Chapter 2 — En Route Operations

Chapter 2 — En Route Operations — Part 2

Chapter 2 — En Route Operations — Part 2

FAA-H-8083-16B (2017)

all pilots in filing preferred routes results in fewer air traffic

delays and better efficiency for departure, en route, and

arrival air traffic service. [Figure 2-15]

Substitute Airway or Route Structures

ARTCCs are responsible for specifying essential substitute

airway or route segments (sub-routes) and fixes for use

during scheduled or unscheduled VOR/VORTAC shutdowns.

Scheduled shutdowns of navigational facilities require

planning and coordination to ensure an uninterrupted

flow of air traffic. Aeronautical Information Services, in

coordination with the ARTCCs, determine when the length

of outages or other factors require publication of sub-

routes and Flight Program Operations (AJW-3) provides

flight inspection services, obstacle clearance verification,

certification, and final approval of substitute routes.

Substitute Airway En Route Flight Procedures

A schedule of proposed facility shutdowns within the region

is maintained and forwarded as far in advance as possible

to enable the substitute routes to be published. Substitute

routes are normally based on VOR/VORTAC facilities

established and published for use in the appropriate

altitude strata. In the case of substitute routes in the upper

airspace stratum, it may be necessary to establish routes by

reference to VOR/VORTAC facilities used in the low altitude

system. Non-directional (radio) beacon (NDB) facilities may

only be used where VOR/VORTAC coverage is inadequate

and ATC requirements necessitate use of such NAVAIDs.

Where operational necessity dictates, NAVAIDs may be

used beyond their standard service volume (SSV) limits that

define the reception limits of unrestricted NAVAIDs, which

are usable for random/unpublished route navigation,

provided that the routes can be given adequate frequency

protection.

Uncontrolled airspace

BCD vortac (shutdown)

ABC vortac

Sub-route V-98

CDE vortac

V-98 Obstacle study and flight

inspection of sub-route required

(Centerline must be in

controlled airspace)

Figure 2-16 14 CFR Part 95 sub-routes.

Uncontrolled airspace

BCD vortac (shutdown)

ABC vortac

Off-airway sub-route

CDE vortac

V-98 Obstacle study and flight

inspection of sub-route required

Figure 2-17 Non-Part 95 sub-routes.

GHI vortac IJK vortac (L)HIJ vortac

V-204 V-204

Obstacle study flight

inspection and ESV’s

required

GHI vortac IJK vortac (L)

HIJ vortac (shutdown)

SUB-ROUTE V-204

60*

Figure 2-18 Sub-route wider than existing route.

The centerline of substitute routes must be contained

within controlled airspace [Figure 2-16], although substitute

routes for off-airway routes may not be in controlled air-

space. [Figure 2-17] Substitute routes are flight inspected

to verify clearance of controlling obstacles and to check for

satisfactory facility performance. If substitute routes do not

overlie existing routes, or are wider than existing routes,

map studies are required to identify controlling obstacles.

[Figure 2-18] The format for describing substitute routes

is from navigational fix to navigational fix. A minimum en

route altitude (MEA) and a maximum authorized altitude

(MAA) are provided for each route segment. Temporary

reporting points may be substituted for the out-of-service

facility and only those other reporting points that are

essential for ATC. Normally, temporary reporting points

over intersections are not necessary where Center radar

coverage exists. A minimum reception altitude (MRA) is

established for each temporary reporting point.

Tower En Route Control

Tower en route control (TEC) is an ATC program available

to pilots that provides a service to aircraft proceeding to

and from metropolitan areas. It links designated approach

control areas by a network of identified routes made up

of the existing airway structure of the NAS, which makes

it possible to fly an IFR flight without leaving approach

control airspace. [Figure 2-19] This service is designed

to help expedite air traffic and reduces ATC and pilot

communication requirements. The program is generally

used by non-turbojet aircraft operating at and below

10,000 feet but a few facilities, such as Milwaukee and

Chicago, have allowed turbojets to proceed between

city pairs. Participating flights are relatively short with a

duration of two hours or less.

TEC is referred to as tower en route, or tower-to-tower, and

allows flight beneath the en route structure. TEC reallocates

airspace both vertically and geographically to allow flight

planning between city pairs while remaining with approach

control airspace. All users are encouraged to use the TEC

route descriptions located in the CS when filing flight plans.

[Figure 2-20] All published TEC routes are designed to avoid

en route airspace, and the majority is within radar coverage.

Tower En Route Control Route Descriptions

The graphic depiction of TEC routes located in the CS is not

to be used for navigation or for detailed flight planning

because not all city pairs are depicted. The information

is intended to show geographic areas connected by TEC.

[Figure 2-19] Pilots should refer to the route descriptions

for specific flight planning.

As shown in Figure 2-20, the route description contains four

columns of information. The first column is the approach

control area within which the departure airport is located,

which are listed alphabetically. The second column shows

the specific route, airway, or radial that is to be used.

The third column shows the highest altitude allowed for

TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL (TEC)

Northeast U.S. (Eastern)

(Lines connecting airports

depict adjacent approach

control facilities)

CLE

Radar approach control area

PIT

CKB

ROA

RIC

IAD

HAR

RDG

ABE

NYC

ACY

WRIPHL

BWI

DOV

AVP

BGM

ELM

DCA

PXT

ORF

CRW

GSO

ERI

BUF

YNG

CAK

HTS

PENNSYLVANIA

WEST VIRGINIA

VIRGINIA

MARYLAND NEW JERSEY

DELAWARE

LEGEND

Figure 2-19. Tower En Route Control (TEC) Northeast U.S. (Eastern).

the route, and the fourth shows the destination airport,

which are also listed alphabetically. When flight planning,

it is important to always check current publications for

information about the departure and destination airport.

Routes are effective only during each respective terminal

facilities normal operating hours. Always check NOTAMs

to ensure that appropriate terminal facilities are operating

for the planned flight time. Altitudes are always listed in

thousands of feet. ATC may request that the pilot changes

altitude while in flight in order to maintain the flight within

approach control airspace. ATC provides radar monitoring

and, if necessary, course guidance if the highest altitude

assigned is below the MEA.

Shown in Figure 2-21, under the second column, the word

“Direct” appears as the route when radar vectors are used

or no airway exists. This also indicates that a SID or STAR

may be assigned by ATC. When a NAVAID or intersection

identifier appears with no airway immediately preceding

or following the identifier, the routing is understood to be

direct to or from that point unless otherwise cleared by ATC.

Routes beginning and ending with an airway indicate that

the airway essentially overflies the airport, or radar vectors

are issued. [Figure 2-21] Where more than one route is listed

to the same destination, ensure that the correct route for

the type of aircraft classification has been filed. These are

denoted after the route in the altitude column using J (jet

powered), M (turbo props/special, cruise speed 190 knots

or greater), P (non-jet, cruise speed 190 knots or greater),

or Q (non-jet, cruise speed 189 knots or less). [Figure 2-22]

Although all airports are not listed under the destination

column, IFR flights may be planned to satellite airports in

the proximity of major airports via the same routing. When

filing flight plans, the coded route identifier (i.e., BURL 1,

VTUL4, or POML3) may be used in lieu of the route of flight.

Highest

Route

Altitude Destination

............ V93 LRP V39 ETX

7000 Allentown

............ V268 LEEAH V229

7000 Atlantic City

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 HFD CLOWW (Single 7000 Bangor

engine and /E, /F . /G only)

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 HFD CLOWW (Single 7000 Bar Harbor

engine and /E, /F . /G only)

............ V93 LRP V499

7000 Binghamton

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229

7000 Boston (North)

HFD HFDO53 DREEM (Single engine only)

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 HFD V3 WOONS

7000 Boston

(Single engine only)

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 BDR BDR014

7000 Boston

JUDDS (Single engine only)

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 BDR (Single

7000 Bradley

engine only)

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 BDR (Single

7000 Bridgeport

engine only)

............ V31 HAR

7000 Capital City

............ V268 ENO

7000 Dover AFB

............ V44 MRB

6000 Dulles

............ V268 ENO V16 JFK V229 BRD MAD

7000 Groton

MAD126 MONDI (Single engine only)

TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL

Approach Control Area

(Including Satellites)

Baltimore

Highest

Route

Altitude Destination

............ EJC V149 LHY

8000 Albany

............ ETX LHY

8000 Albany

............ V149 MAZIE ARD CYN

5000 Atlantic City

............ V93 LRP

8000 Baltimore

............ EXT V162 DUMMR V93 LRP

6000 Baltimore

............ V39 LRP

8000 Baltimore

............ V130

10000 Bradley

............ Direct

10000 Bradley

............ FJC STW

5000 Caldwell

............ (2) EXT V30 SBJ

5000 Farmingdale

............ ETX V162 HAR

8000 Harrisburg

............ Direct

10000 Hartford

............ EXT ETX004 WEISS

4000 Hazleton

............ EXT V39

4000 Lancaster

TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL

Approach Control Area

(Including Satellites)

Allentown

Figure 2-20. Chart Supplement (NE), Tower En Route Control route descriptions (Baltimore).

Figure 2-21. Chart Supplement (NE), Tower En Route Control route descriptions (Allentown).

Highest

Route

Altitude Destination

............ V229 DIXIE V276 ARD

6000 Allentown

............ V1 DIXIE V276 ARD (Single engine only)

6000 Allentown

............ V1 ATR V308 OTT

4000 Andrews, AFB

............ LEEAH V268 BAL

4000 Baltimore

............ V1 JFK V229 HFD CLOWM (Single engine and 6000 Bangor

/E, /F , /G only)

............ V1 JFK V229 HFD CLOWM (Single engine and 6000 Bar Harbor

/E, /F , /G only)

............ V1 JFK V229 HFD HFD053 DREEM (Single

6000 Boston (North)

(Single engine only)

............ V1 JFK V229 HFD V3 WOONS (Single engine 6000 Boston

only

............ V1 JFK V229 HFD FOSTY WOONS (Single

6000 Boston

engine only)

............ V1 JFK V229 BDR BDR14 JUDDS (Single

6000 Bradley

engine only)

............ V184 ZIGGI JFK 210 JFK V229 BDR (Twins

6000 Bridgeport

only, n/a between 1400-2100)

............ HOWIE V1 JFK V229 BDR (Single engine only) 6000 Bridgeport

............ V184 00D DQO V469 HAR

4000 Capital City

TOWER EN ROUTE CONTROL

Approach Control Area

(Including Satellites)

Atlantic City

Figure 2-22. Chart Supplement (NE), Tower En Route Control route descriptions (Atlantic City).

Airway and Route System

There are three fixed route systems established for

air navigation purposes. They are the Federal airway

consisting of VOR (low victor airways, high jet routes),

NDB (low or medium frequency) and the RNAV route

system. To the extent possible, these route systems are

aligned in an overlying manner to facilitate transition

between each. The majority of the airways are made up

of victor airways, jet routes, and RNAV, but some low/

medium frequency (L/MF) airways and routes are still

being used in Alaska and one other that is located off

the coast of North Carolina and is called Green 13 (G13).

[Figure 2-23]

Airway/Route Depiction

IFR en route charts show all IFR radio NAVAIDs that have

been flight-checked by the FAA and are operational. The

FAA, Aeronautical Information Services publishes and

distributes U.S. Government Civil Aeronautical Charts and

flight information publications. IFR en route navigation

information is provided on three charts: IFR en route low

Figure 2-23. Low frequency airway G13.

altitude chart, IFR en route high altitude chart, and Terminal

Area Chart (TAC). [Figure 2-24A and B]

Figure 2-24. IFR en route low altitude (left) and high altitude (right) charts.

IFR En Route Low Altitude Chart

En route low altitude charts provide aeronautical

information for navigation under IFR conditions below

18,000 feet MSL. Low altitude charts [Figure 2-25] include

the following information:

• Airways [Figure 2-25A]

• RNAV routes [Figure 2-25B]

• Limits of controlled airspace [Figure 2-25C]

• VHF radio aids to navigation (frequency, identification,

channel, geographic coordinates) [Figure 2-25D]

• Airports that have an instrument approach procedure

or a minimum 3,000 foot hard surface runway

[Figure 2-25E]

• Off-route obstruction clearance altitudes (OROCA)

[Figure 2-25F]

• Reporting points [Figure 2-25G]

• Special use airspace areas [Figure 2-25H]

• Military training routes [Figure 2-25I]

IFR aeronautical charts depict VOR airways (airways based

on VOR or VORTAC NAVAIDs) in black, identified by a “V”

(Victor) followed by the route number (e.g., V12). [Figure

2-26] LF/MF airways (airways based on LF/MF NAVAIDs)

are sometimes referred to as colored airways because they

are identified by color name and number (e.g., Amber One,

charted as A1). Green and red airways are plotted east and

west, and amber and blue airways are plotted north and

south. Regardless of their color identifier, LF/MF airways

are depicted in brown. [Figure 2-27]

Airway/route data, such as the airway identifications,

bearings or radials, mileages, and altitude (e.g., MEA),

minimum obstacle clearance altitude (MOCA), and MAA,

are shown aligned with the airway and in the same color

as the airway. [Figure 2-26]

All airways/routes that are predicated on VOR or VORTAC

NAVAIDs are defined by the outbound radial from the

NAVAID. Airways/routes that are predicated on LF/MF

NAVAIDs are defined by the inbound bearing.

New low altitude RNAV routes have been created by the

FAA. RNAV routes provide more direct routing for IFR

aircraft and enhance the safety and efficiency of the NAS. In

order to utilize these routes, aircraft must be equipped with

IFR approved GNSS. In Alaska, when using RNAV routes, the

aircraft must be equipped with Technical Standing Order

(TSO)-145a and 146a equipment.

Low altitude RNAV only routes are identified by the letter

“T” prefix, followed by a three digit number (T-200 to T-500).

RNAV routes are depicted in aeronautical blue, as well as the

RNAV route data, which includes the following [Figure 2-28]:

• Route line

• Identification boxes

122.4

Figure 2-25. Information found on en route low altitude charts.

Figure 2-26. Victor airways.

Figure 2-27. LF/MF airways.

E VALENTINE

Miller Fld

(VTN)

2596 47L

VALENTINE

314 VTN

35 10000

V190 53

TAFOY

L 83

28.55

Victor Route (with RNAV/GPS

MEA shown in blue)

*35 00

3 50 0G

S 50 0

5000G

*5400

6000G

268 088

NGOZI

GRANT

Waypoint

Magnetic reference bearing

Hot Springs Muni

(HSR)

3150 45L

AINSWORTH

112.7 ANW 74

N42°34.15' W99°59.38'

COLUMBUS

122.4D

+

CYR-000

CYA-000

(MU) D-000

SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE

WALL 1

MOA

WALL 2

MOA

Exclusion area and note

Line delimits

internal separation

of same special

use area or

exclusion areas

IR-15-17

AINSWORTH

114.0 MAI 87

N30°47.17' W85°07.47'

GAINESVILLE

Figure 2-28. Low altitude RNAV routes.

• Mileages

• Waypoints

• Waypoint names

• Magnetic reference bearings

• MEAs

Magnetic reference bearings are shown originating from a

waypoint, fix/reporting point, or NAVAID. A GNSS MEA for

each segment is established to ensure obstacle clearance

Figure 2-29. Low altitude RNAV route data.

and communications reception. All MEAs are identified

with a “G” suffix. [Figure 2-29]

Joint Victor/RNAV routes are depicted using black for

the victor airways and blue for the RNAV routes, and the

identification boxes for each are shown adjacent to one

another. Magnetic reference bearings are not shown. MEAs

are stacked in pairs or in two separate columns, GNSS

and Victor. On joint routes, or victor routes, RNAV specific

information is printed in blue. [Figure 2-30]

5000G

*5400

6000G

268 088

NGOZI

GRANT

Waypoint

Magnetic reference bearing

T228 V333

JES VAL BILLY TOMMY YATES

333 3324400

7000G

*6700

8000G

*6700

10 10 49 40109

Figure 2-30. Joint Victor/RNAV airway.

Original source PDFPublished from pages 69–76 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗