InfoDotInc / archive systemEstablished online record · rebuilding deliberately
InfoDotInc

Technical documents, historic paths, and source-backed reference material.

Archive / FAA Helicopter Flying Handbook / FAA Helicopter Flying Handbook: Chapter 3 — Helicopter Flight Controls

Chapter 3 — Helicopter Flight Controls

Chapter 3 — Helicopter Flight Controls — Part 2

FAA-H-8083-21B (2019)

Main rotor system

Landing gear

Tail rotor system

Airframe

Fuselage

Transmission

Powerplant

Figure 4-1. The major components of a helicopter are the airframe, fuselage, landing gear, powerplant, transmission, main rotor

system,and tail rotor system.

Fuselage

The fuselage, the outer core of the airframe, is an aircraft’s

main body section that houses the cabin that holds the crew,

passengers, and cargo. Helicopter cabins have a variety of

seating arrangements. Most have the pilot seated on the right

side, although there are some with the pilot seated on the

left side or center. The fuselage also houses the engine, the

transmission, avionics, flight controls, and the powerplant.

[Figure 4-1]

Main Rotor System

The rotor system is the rotating part of a helicopter which

generates lift. The rotor consists of a mast, hub, and rotor

blades. The mast is a hollow cylindrical metal shaft which

extends upwards from and is driven and sometimes supported

by the transmission. At the top of the mast is the attachment

point for the rotor blades called the hub. The rotor blades are

then attached to the hub by any number of different methods.

Main rotor systems are classified according to how the main

rotor blades are attached and move relative to the main rotor

hub. There are three basic classifications: semirigid, rigid,

or fully articulated. Some modern rotor systems, such as the

bearingless rotor system, use an engineered combination of

these types.

Semirigid Rotor System

A semirigid rotor system is usually composed of two blades

that are rigidly mounted to the main rotor hub. The main rotor

hub is free to tilt with respect to the main rotor shaft on what

is known as a teetering or flapping hinge. This allows the

blades to flap together as a unit. As one blade flaps up, the

other flaps down. Since there is no vertical drag hinge, lead/

lag forces are absorbed and mitigated by blade bending. The

semirigid rotor is also capable of feathering, which means that

the pitch angle of the blade changes. This is made possible

by the feathering hinge. [Figure 4-2]

If the semirigid rotor system is an underslung rotor, the center

of gravity (CG) is below where it is attached to the mast. This

underslung mounting is designed to align the blade’s center

of mass with a common flapping hinge so that both blades’

centers of mass vary equally in distance from the center of

rotation during flapping. The rotational speed of the system

tends to change, but this is restrained by the inertia of the

engine and flexibility of the drive system. Only a moderate

amount of stiffening at the blade root is necessary to handle

this restriction. Simply put, underslinging effectively

eliminates geometric imbalance. [Figure 4-3]

Static stops

Pitch horn

Main rotor mast

Feathering hinge

Teetering hinge

Figure 4-2. The teetering hinge allows the main rotor hub to tilt, and

the feathering hinge enables the pitch angle of the blades to change.

Center of gravity

Center of gravity

Mast axis

Figure 4-3. With an underslung rotor, the center of gravity (CG) remains in the same approximate location relative to the mast before

and after rotor tilt.

The underslung rotor system mitigates the lead/lag forces by

mounting the blades slightly lower than the usual plane of

rotation, so the lead/lag forces are minimized. As the blades

cone upward, the center of pressures of the blades are almost

in the same plane as the hub. Whatever stresses are remaining

bend the blades for compliance.

Helicopters with semirigid rotors are vulnerable to a

condition known as mast bumping which can cause the rotor

flap stops to shear the mast. The mechanical design of the

semirigid rotor system dictates downward flapping of the

blades must have some physical limit. Mast bumping is the

result of excessive rotor flapping. Each rotor system design

has a maximum flapping angle. If flapping exceeds the design

value, the static stop will contact the mast. The static stop is

a component of the main rotor providing limited movement

of strap fittings and a contoured surface between the mast

and hub. It is the violent contact between the static stop and

the mast during flight that causes mast damage or separation.

This contact must be avoided at all costs.

Mast bumping is directly related to how much the blade

system flaps. In straight and level flight, blade flapping is

minimal, perhaps 2° under usual flight conditions. Flapping

angles increase slightly with high forward speeds, at low

rotor rpm, at high-density altitudes, at high gross weights, and

when encountering turbulence. Maneuvering the aircraft in a

sideslip or during low-speed flight at extreme CG positions

can induce larger flapping angles.

Rigid Rotor System

The rigid rotor system shown in Figure 4-4 is mechanically

simple, but structurally complex because operating loads

must be absorbed in bending rather than through hinges. In

this system, the blade roots are rigidly attached to the rotor

hub. Rigid rotor systems tend to behave like fully articulated

systems through aerodynamics, but lack flapping or lead/

lag hinges. Instead, the blades accommodate these motions

by bending. They cannot flap or lead/lag, but they can be

feathered. As advancements in helicopter aerodynamics

Good control

response

Simple, easy to

hangar due to two

blades

Simple design,

crisp response

High aerodynamic

drag. More complex,

greater cost.

Reaction to control

input not as quick

as articulated head.

Vibration can be

higher than multi-

bladed articulated

systems.

Higher vibration than

articulated rotor.

DisadvantagesSystem Type Advantages

Articulated

Semirigid

(Teetering,

Underslung, or

See-Saw)

Rigid

Figure 4-5. Differences in handling between the types of rotor

systems.

Main rotor blades

Main rotor hub

Blade pitch horns

Main rotor blades

Main rotor mast

Pitch change links

Figure 4-4. Four-blade hingeless (rigid) main rotor. Rotor blades are comprised of glass fiber reinforced material. The hub is a single

piece of forged rigid titanium.

and materials continue to improve, rigid rotor systems may

become more common because the system is fundamentally

easier to design and offers the best properties of both

semirigid and fully articulated systems.

The rigid rotor system is very responsive and is usually

not susceptible to mast bumping like the semirigid systems

because the rotor hubs are mounted solid to the main rotor

mast. This allows the rotor and fuselage to move together

as one entity and eliminates much of the oscillation usually

present in the other rotor systems. Other advantages of the rigid

rotor include a reduction in the weight and drag of the rotor

hub and a larger flapping arm, which significantly reduces

control inputs. Without the complex hinges, the rotor system

becomes much more reliable and easier to maintain than the

other rotor configurations. A disadvantage of this system is

the quality of ride in turbulent or gusty air. Because there are

no hinges to help absorb the larger loads, vibrations are felt

in the cabin much more than with other rotor head designs.

There are several variations of the basic three rotor head

designs. The bearingless rotor system is closely related to

the articulated rotor system but has no bearings or hinges.

This design relies on the structure of blades and hub to absorb

stresses. The main difference between the rigid rotor system

and the bearingless system is that the bearingless system has

no feathering bearing—the material inside the cuff is twisted

by the action of the pitch change arm. Nearly all bearingless

rotor hubs are made of fiber-composite materials. The

differences in handling between the types of rotor system

are summarized in Figure 4-5.

Fully Articulated Rotor System

Fully articulated rotor systems allow each blade to lead/lag

(move back and forth in plane), flap (move up and down

about an inboard mounted hinge) independent of the other

blades, and feather (rotate about the pitch axis to change lift).

[Figures 4-6 and 4-7] Each of these blade motions is related

Rotor blade

Lagging positionLeading position

Rotor hub Center of rotation

Lead/lag hinge

(Vertical hinge)

Pure Radial Position

Lead/lag or drag hinge

Lagging position

Leading position

Figure 4-6. Lead/lag hinge allows the rotor blade to move back

and forth in plane.

Figure 4-7. Fully articulated flapping hub. Figure 4-8. Fully articulated rotor blade with flapping hinge.

to the others. Fully articulated rotor systems are found on

helicopters with more than two main rotor blades.

As the rotor spins, each blade responds to inputs from the

control system to enable aircraft control. The center of lift

on the whole rotor system moves in response to these inputs

to effect pitch, roll, and upward motion. The magnitude of

this lift force is based on the collective input, which changes

pitch on all blades in the same direction at the same time. The

location of this lift force is based on the pitch and roll inputs

from the pilot. Therefore, the feathering angle of each blade

(proportional to its own lifting force) changes as it rotates

with the rotor, hence the name “cyclic control.”

As the lift on a given blade increases, it tends to flap upwards.

The flapping hinge for the blade permits this motion and is

balanced by the centrifugal force of the weight of the blade,

which tries to keep it in the horizontal plane. [Figure 4-8]

Either way, some motion must be accommodated. The

centrifugal force is nominally constant; however, the flapping

force is affected by the severity of the maneuver (rate of

climb, forward speed, aircraft gross weight). As the blade

flaps, its CG changes. This changes the local moment of

inertia of the blade with respect to the rotor system and it

speeds up or slows down with respect to the rest of the blades

and the whole rotor system. This is accommodated by the

lead/lag or drag hinge, shown in Figure 4-9, and is easier to

visualize with the classical ‘ice skater doing a spin’ image.

As the skater moves her arms in, she spins faster because her

inertia changes but her total energy remains constant (neglect

friction for purposes of this explanation). Conversely, as

her arms extend, her spin slows. This is also known as the

conservation of angular momentum. An in-plane damper

typically moderates lead/lag motion.

Following a single blade through a single rotation beginning

at some neutral position, as load increases from increased

feathering, it flaps up and leads forward. As it continues

Figure 4-10. Tandem rotor heads.

Pitch horn

Pitch change axis (feathering)

Drag hingeFlapping hinge

Damper

Figure 4-9. Drag hinge.

around, it flaps down and lags backward. At the lowest

point of load, it is at its lowest flap angle and also at its most

‘rearward’ lag position. Because the rotor is a large, rotating

mass, it behaves somewhat like a gyroscope. The effect of

this is that a control input is usually realized on the attached

body at a position 90° prior to the control input displacement

in the axis of rotation. This is accounted for by the designers

through placement of the control input to the rotor system

so that a forward input of the cyclic control stick results in a

nominally forward motion of the aircraft. The effect is made

transparent to the pilot.

Older hinge designs relied on conventional metal bearings. By

basic geometry, this precludes a coincident flapping and lead/

lag hinge and is cause for recurring maintenance. Newer rotor

systems use elastomeric bearings, arrangements of rubber

and steel that can permit motion in two axes. Besides solving

some of the above-mentioned kinematic issues, these bearings

are usually in compression, can be readily inspected, and

eliminate the maintenance associated with metallic bearings.

Elastomeric bearings are naturally fail-safe, and their wear

is gradual and visible. The metal-to-metal contact of older

bearings and the need for lubrication is eliminated in this design.

Tandem Rotor

Tandem rotor (sometimes referred to as dual rotor)

helicopters have two large horizontal rotor assemblies; a twin

rotor system, instead of one main assembly, and a smaller

tail rotor. [Figure 4-10] Single rotor helicopters need an

anti-torque system to neutralize the twisting momentum

produced by the single large rotor. Tandem rotor helicopters,

however, use counter-rotating rotors, with each canceling

out the other’s torque. Counter-rotating rotor blades will not

collide with and destroy each other if they flex into the other

rotor’s pathway. This configuration also has the advantage

of being able to hold more weight with shorter blades, since

there are two sets. Also, all of the power from the engines can

be used for lift, whereas a single rotor helicopter uses power

to counter the torque.

Coaxial Rotors

A coaxial rotor system is a pair of rotors mounted on the same

shaft but turning in opposite directions. This design eliminates

the need for a tail rotor or other antitorque mechanisms, and

since the blades turn in opposite directions, the effects of

dissymmetry of lift are avoided. The main disadvantage

of coaxial rotors is the increased mechanical complexity

of the rotor system. Numerous Russian helicopters, such

as the Kaman Ka-31 and Ka-50, along with the Sikorsky

experimental X2 use a coaxial rotor design.

Intermeshing Rotors

An intermeshing rotor system is a set of two rotors turning

in the opposite directions with each rotor mast mounted on

the helicopter with a slight angle, so the blades intermesh

without colliding. This design also eliminates the need for an

antitorque system, which provides more engine power for lift.

However, neither rotor lifts directly vertical which reduces

each rotor’s efficiency. The Kaman HH-43, which was used

by the USAF in a firefighting role and the Kaman K-MAX

are examples of an intermeshing rotor systems.

Swash Plate Assembly

The purpose of the swash plate is to convert stationary

control inputs from the pilot into rotating inputs which can be

connected to the rotor blades or control surfaces. It consists

of two main parts: stationary swash plate and rotating swash

plate. [Figure 4-11]

Blade rotation

Blade rotation

Tail rotor thrust

to compensate

for torque

Torque

Torque

Rotating swash plate

Control rod

Stationary swash plate

Pitch link

Drive link

Inner and outer parts turning at same rpm

Outer turning much faster than inner

Figure 4-11. Stationary and rotating swash plate.

Figure 4-13. Antitorque rotor produces thrust to oppose torque.

Figure 4-12. Freewheeling unit in normal drive position and

freewheeling position. Note that in the top example, the engine

output shaft (inner part) drives the rotor shaft (outer part) at the

same speed (normal flight). In the bottom example, the rotor shaft

(outer part) breaks free under autorotation, as it turns faster than

the driver shaft (inner part).

changes, or to make heading changes while hovering. Most

helicopters drive the tail rotor shaft from the transmission

to ensure tail rotor rotation (and hence control) in the event

that the engine quits. Usually, negative antitorque thrust is

needed in autorotations to overcome transmission friction.

The stationary swash plate is mounted around the main rotor

mast and connected to the cyclic and collective controls by a

series of pushrods. It is restrained from rotating by an anti-

drive link but can tilt in all directions and move vertically.

The rotating swash plate is mounted to the stationary swash

plate by means of a uniball sleeve. It is connected to the mast

by drive links and must rotate in constant relationship with

the main rotor mast. Both swash plates tilt and slide up and

down as one unit. The rotating swash plate is connected to

the pitch horns by the pitch links.

Freewheeling Unit

Since lift in a helicopter is provided by rotating airfoils,

these airfoils must be free to rotate if the engine fails. The

freewheeling unit automatically disengages the engine from

the main rotor when engine revolutions per minute (rpm)

is less than main rotor rpm. [Figure 4-12] This allows the

main rotor and tail rotor to continue turning at normal in-

flight speeds. The most common freewheeling unit assembly

consists of a one-way sprag clutch located between the engine

and main rotor transmission. This is usually in the upper

pulley in a piston helicopter or mounted on the accessory

gearbox in a turbine helicopter. When the engine is driving

the rotor, inclined surfaces in the sprag clutch force rollers

against an outer drum. This prevents the engine from

exceeding transmission rpm. If the engine fails, the rollers

move inward, allowing the outer drum to exceed the speed

of the inner portion. The transmission can then exceed the

speed of the engine. In this condition, engine speed is less

than that of the drive system, and the helicopter is in an

autorotative state.

Antitorque System

Helicopters with a single, main rotor system require a

separate antitorque system. This is most often accomplished

through a variable pitch, antitorque rotor or tail rotor.

[Figure 4-13] Pilots vary the thrust of the antitorque system to

maintain directional control whenever the main rotor torque

Air jet

Downwash

Lift

Rotating nozzle

Main rotor wake

Air intake

Figure 4-15. While in a hover, Coanda effect supplies approximately

two-thirds of the lift necessary to maintain directional control.

The rest is created by directing the thrust from the controllable

rotating nozzle.

Figure 4-14. Fenestron or “fan-in-tail” antitorque system. This design

provides an improved margin of safety during ground operations.

Fenestron

Another form of antitorque system is the Fenestron or “fan-

in-tail” design. This system uses a series of rotating blades

shrouded within a vertical tail. Because the blades are located

within a circular duct, they are less likely to come into contact

with people or objects. [Figure 4-14]

NOTAR®

Using the natural characteristics of helicopter aerodynamics,

the NOTAR ® antitorque system provides safe, quiet,

responsive, foreign object damage (FOD) resistant directional

control. The enclosed variable-pitch composite blade fan

produces a low pressure, high volume of ambient air to

pressurize the composite tailboom. The air is expelled

through two slots which run the length of the tailboom on the

right side, causing a boundary-layer control called the Coanda

effect. The result is that the tailboom becomes a “wing,”

flying in the downwash of the rotor system, producing up to

60 percent of the antitorque required in a hover. The balance

of the directional control is accomplished by a rotating direct

jet thruster. In forward flight, the vertical stabilizers provide

the majority of the antitorque; however, directional control

remains a function of the direct jet thruster. The NOTAR ®

antitorque system eliminates some of the mechanical

disadvantages of a tail rotor, including long drive shafts,

hanger bearings, intermediate gearboxes and 90° gearboxes.

[Figure 4-15]

Antitorque Drive Systems

The antitorque drive system consists of an antitorque drive

shaft and a antitorque gearbox mounted at the end of the tail

boom. The drive shaft may consist of one long shaft or a

series of shorter shafts connected at both ends with flexible

couplings. This allows the drive shaft to flex with the tail

boom. The tail rotor gearbox provides a right-angle drive

for the tail rotor and may also include gearing to adjust the

output to optimum tail rotor rpm. [Figure 4-16] Tail rotors

may also have an intermediate gearbox to turn the power up

a pylon or vertical fin.

Engines

Reciprocating Engines

Reciprocating engines, also called piston engines, are

generally used in smaller helicopters. Most training

helicopters use reciprocating engines because they are

relatively simple and inexpensive to operate. Refer to the

Pilot’s Handbook of Aeronautical Knowledge for a detailed

explanation and illustrations of the piston engine.

Turbine Engines

Turbine engines are more powerful and are used in a wide

variety of helicopters. They produce a tremendous amount

of power for their size but are generally more expensive

to operate. The turbine engine used in helicopters operates

differently from those used in airplane applications. In most

applications, the exhaust outlets simply release expended

gases and do not contribute to the forward motion of the

helicopter. Approximately 75 percent of the incoming airflow

is used to cool the engine.

The gas turbine engine mounted on most helicopters is

made up of a compressor, combustion chamber, turbine,

and accessory gearbox assembly. The compressor draws

filtered air into the plenum chamber and compresses it.

Common type filters are centrifugal swirl tubes where debris

is ejected outward and blown overboard prior to entering

the compressor, or engine barrier filters (EBF), similar to

the K&N filter element used in automotive applications.

Original source PDFPublished from pages 58–64 of the recorded source chapter.
Open source PDF ↗